Searching for a Language of Lament
The
murder of Drummer Lee Rigby in Woolwich last week has shown again how living in
an age of mass media distorts our normal human responses. The problem of
over-exposure to tragedy is well known – the images on our TV screens no longer have any effect on us – but this atrocity revealed again that our
responses can also become affected. This isn’t a rant against the press, just a
few thoughts on how it might be possible for public figures to better express
themselves, using the media for authentic communication rather than letting it
control them and their reactions.
This deeply
disturbing event has induced public statements from politicians and faith leaders
from across the country. But the problem with statements is that they produce
soundbites, and the problem with soundbites is that they’re reductive, boiling
all complexity down to pithy sentences which can be easily quoted. It
was particularly these lines spoken by David Cameron outside Number 10 that were
unsettling: ‘The people who did this were
trying to divide us. They should know: something like this will only bring us
together and make us stronger.’
In many
conversations since I’ve struggled to articulate why these words made me uneasy.
I don’t want to sound unreasonable; I understand that issuing rallying
cries is part of a politician’s job – we need our leaders to make bold claims
designed to reassure at times of national crisis. But the merest trace of
triumphalism seemed misplaced to me – wasn’t it too early for our ears to hear a message of ‘being made stronger’
when our eyes were still bombarded by images of men holding meat cleavers next
to a crumpled body? Wasn’t it too simplistic to anticipate a society ‘coming
together’ whilst the English Defence League went on the rampage and reports of retributive
attacks on Muslims spiked?
But it’s
not just nuance or subtlety that gets eradicated, it’s that the press office
treatment seems to iron out all genuine human emotion too. There were plenty of
exclamations of moral outrage (Cameron was ‘sickened’ by the ‘shocking’
event, the Muslim Council of Britain ‘condemned’ a ‘truly barbaric attack’), but there were very few
expressions of grief at the loss of a husband and a father, of despair that two
young men had given their lives to such warped ideology. Such sanitised
reaction seemed removed from the real tragedy of what happened on the streets
of South London.
For in
failing to come close to the real pain of such an event, public figures then
fail to express any true compassion. I lost count of the number of times I
heard the formulaic phrase ‘our thoughts are with the victim and his family’ – every
interview had to start with these words until it began sounding like a tick-box
exercise in condolence. Even Archbishop Welby’s statement, though timely in its
expression of unity with Muslim leaders, felt a little empty in its prosaic expression
of ‘our prayers are with...’. Again I acknowledge the burden of
expectation on Justin Welby in his public role and I don’t envy his job, and
yet perhaps the Church could do more at these times to be seen to ‘mourn with
those who mourn’ (Romans 12:15). ‘Out of the depths I cry to you, Lord,’
says the psalmist. The Bible is full of the language of lament: let us not be
afraid to use it.
And
maybe this is true for how people of faith respond to suffering more
generally. For in our efforts to bring hope in desperate situations it can be
all too easy to offer platitudes and false optimism; in wanting to lift people
out of their trials we can fail to stand with them. Television dramatist Dennis
Potter put it very frankly in an interview with Melvyn Bragg just weeks before
he died (having been diagnosed with terminal cancer at just fifty-eight he may
have heard rather too many banalities from the mouths of well-meaning religious
types):
‘I don’t
see the point of not acknowledging the pain and the misery and the grief of the
world,’ he said, ‘And if you say ‘Ah but God understands’ or ‘Through it you’ll
come to a greater appreciation...’ I mean, I don’t think... well you nasty old
sod, if that’s God... that’s not God, that’s not my God.’
Of course there are times when we must speak words of
hope, the radical hope of the gospel, but there are also times when simply pointing
to the God of Romans 8 ‘who works all things together for good’ (the spiritual
equivalent of David Cameron’s promise that ‘this will make us stronger’ ) might sound hollow to someone in pain. Perhaps
at these times we’d do better to turn to John’s gospel and read that even
though he knew the end from the beginning, he knew the hope of glory, he knew
all would be well, still ‘Jesus wept’.
Comments
Post a Comment